What is the first step in moral reasoning?

What is the first step in moral reasoning?

The first stage in the pre-conventional level is obedience and punishment. In this stage people, usually young children, avoid certain behaviors only because of the fear of punishment, not because they see them as wrong.

What is the first step in ethical decision making?

The first step in ethical decision making is to recognize that an ethical issue requires an individual or work group to choose among several actions that various stakeholders will ultimately evaluate as right or wrong.

What are the stages in moral decision making?

Kohlberg, 1976, Kohlberg, 1981 proposed six stages of moral judgement, grouped into three levels: pre-conventional, conventional and post-conventional.

What are the four steps of moral action?

He concluded that ethical action is the result of four psychological processes: (1) moral sensitivity (recognition), (2) moral judgment (reasoning), (3) moral focus (motivation), and (4) moral character (action). The first step in moral behavior requires that the individual interpret the situation as moral.

What is the second step in moral reasoning?

Level One-Preconventional Morality: In stage one, moral reasoning is based on concepts of punishment. The child believes that if the consequence for an action is punishment, then the action was wrong. In the second stage, the child bases his or her thinking on self-interest and reward.

Which comes first the reason or the will?

Free Will and Practical Reason To explain, the will is guided by reason, where, as determined by reason, action is performed according to rational requirements, or laws of reason. Reason directs6 action by “determination of the will”7 — as long as the will is guided by reason.

Which of the following is the first step in the ethical decision making process quizlet?

The first step in the ethical decision making process is to recognize that an issure requires an individual or work group to make a choice that ultimately will be judged by stakeholders as right or wrong.

Which of the following is the first step of the process of rational decision making?

Identifying a few possible courses of action is the first step involved in the rational decision making process.

What are the 5 stages of moral development?


  • Theoretical framework. Level 1: Preconventional level. Stage 1: Punishment/obedience orientation. Stage 2: Instrumental purpose orientation. Level 2: Conventional level. Stage 3: Good Boy/Nice Girl orientation. Stage 4: Law and order orientation.
  • Basic tenets of Kohlberg’s theory.
  • Measurement of moral development.
  • Which one of the following is the right order for three stages of moral development?

    Kohlberg suggested that people move through these stages in a fixed order, and that moral understanding is linked to cognitive development. The three levels of moral reasoning include preconventional, conventional, and postconventional.

    Which of the following represents the first step in the decision making process?

    The first step in decision making process is the clear identification of opportunities or the diagnosis of problems that require a decision. Objectives reflect the results the organization wants to attain. Objective is the desired result to be attained when making decisions.

    What is the 4 component model?

    The 4-component (4C) model, which divides body weight into fat, water, mineral, and protein, can overcome these limitations.

    What makes a moral judgement sound or acceptable?

    Reliable moral judgments must be based on sound moral principles—principles that can withstand critical scrutiny and rational criticism. What, precisely, makes a moral principle sound or acceptable is one of the most difficult questions that the study of ethics raises.

    Is it true that moral reasoning is a practical question?

    It is also true that, on some understandings, moral reasoning directed towards deciding what to do involves forming judgments about what one ought, morally, to do. On these understandings, asking what one ought (morally) to do can be a practical question, a certain way of asking about what to do.

    Which is an alternative explanation of moral dumbfounding?

    An alternative explanation of moral dumbfounding looks to social norms of moral reasoning (Sneddon 2007).

    Do you think the idea of reasoning involves norms?

    Still, it will do for present purposes. It suffices to make clear that the idea of reasoning involves norms of thinking. These norms of aptness or correctness in practical thinking surely do not require us to think along a single prescribed pathway, but rather permit only certain pathways and not others (Broome 2013, 219).