Admin Table of Contents
What was the meaning behind the slogan old enough to fight old enough to vote and when did it first arise?
“Old enough to fight, old enough to vote,” a slogan first heard during World War II, was adopted by student activists during the Vietnam War. In 1942, the slogan prompted Congressman Jennings Randolph of West Virginia to propose an amendment to the Constitution lowering the voting age to 18.
What happened in 1976 with the 26th Amendment?
The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Amendment XXVI) lowered the minimum voting age in the United States from 21 to 18.
What amendment extend the vote to 18 year olds in 1971?
The Twenty-sixth Amendment (Amendment XXVI) to the United States Constitution prohibits the states and the federal government from using age as a reason for denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen years old.
When was the ratification of the 26th Amendment?
Passage, Ratification and Effects of the 26th Amendment On March 10, 1971, the U.S. Senate voted unanimously in favor of the proposed amendment. After an overwhelming House vote in favor on March 23, the 26th Amendment went to the states for ratification.
Who was the first president to support the 26th Amendment?
Presidential & Congression Support for the 26th Amendment. Dwight D. Eisenhower, who led the U.S. armed forces to victory in Europe in 1945, later became the first president to publicly voice his support for a constitutional amendment lowering the minimum voting age.
Who was the author of the 26th Amendment?
The 26th Amendment: “Old Enough to Fight, Old Enough to Vote”. Jennings Randolph, then a Democratic congressman from West Virginia, introduced federal legislation to lower the voting age in 1942; it was the first of 11 times that Randolph, who was later elected to the Senate, would introduce such a bill in Congress.
What was the Supreme Court decision on the 26th Amendment?
Supreme Court Decision on the 26th Amendment. In the 1970 case Oregon v. Mitchell, the U.S. Supreme Court was tasked with reviewing the constitutionality of the provision.