How was the Revolutionary War an engine for political and social change?

How was the Revolutionary War an engine for political and social change?

The Revolutionary War was an “engine” for political change, because the colonists tried to make a government based on natural laws like freedom and one that was very unlike GB’s gov’t so it supported itself with three branches that checked each other to make sure one did not have too much power and balance each other.

Do you think Lincoln’s decision to fire McClellan was a good one why or why?

The decision was good because McClellan failed to act decisively when he had a chance to win the war. By issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, President Lincoln made slavery the focus of the war. By issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, President Lincoln made slavery the focus of the war.

Do you think that Lincoln’s measures to deal with disloyalty and dissent represented an abuse of power?

Did Lincoln’s measures to deal with disloyalty and dissent represent an abuse of power? Lincoln did not abuse his power because he was justified in limiting civil liberties to save the Union.

What was one major outcome of the North winning the US Civil War quizlet?

What was one major result of the North’s victory in the Civil War? -The power of the Supreme Court was limited.

Why did the north have an advantage in World War 2?

The North had more advantage in terms of industrial production than the South because their population was higher. What do the overall data suggest about the eventual outcome of the war?

What was the outcome of the Korean War?

The outcome of the Korean War was satisfactory for the United States. Communist advances had been contained and the ROK preserved as a bulwark against communism in Asia. Korea also had a far ranging impact on US policy and the policy of containment was to be applied to South Vietnam with disastrous results.

Why did both men believe in total war?

Explain. Both men believed in total war, which meant that it was essential to fight not only the South’s armies and government but its civilian population as well. In order to win the war they had to destroy everything their opponents had including their homes, land and railroads.

Why did grant and Sherman use Total War?

Grant and Sherman presented a logical rationale for using the strategy of total war. Do you think the end—defeating the Confederacy—justified the means— causing harm to civilians? Explain. Both men believed in total war, which meant that it was essential to fight not only the South’s armies and government but its civilian population as well.